High Court Rejects Activists’ Legal Challenge Over Shooting of Stray Dog ‘Kopi’
KUALA TERENGGANU, Feb 26 — The Kuala Terengganu High Court has dismissed a lawsuit brought by animal rights activists against the Besut District Council and the Terengganu state government over the shooting of a stray dog known as ‘Kopi’.
The ruling, delivered by Judicial Commissioner Yusrin Faidz Yusoff, marked a significant development in a case that had drawn widespread public attention and debate.
According to counsel Adam Luqman Amdan, who represented the Besut District Council, the court found that the plaintiffs did not have the legal standing required to pursue the case.
He explained that none of the individuals involved were residents of Besut, and they were unable to demonstrate a direct and legitimate interest in the matter.
The court also agreed with the defence’s argument that the legal action was effectively an attempt to determine criminal responsibility through civil proceedings.
Such matters, the court noted, fall under the jurisdiction of prosecutorial authorities rather than civil litigation.
Court Finds Shooting Permitted Under Existing Laws
In its decision, the court also considered provisions within Malaysia’s Animal Welfare Act 2015, which allow the use of firearms in managing animal populations under certain circumstances.
The ruling concluded that the actions taken by the local council were consistent with these provisions, as well as with local by-laws governing animal control.
Additionally, the court determined that the Terengganu state government could not be held legally responsible for the incident.
The lawsuit had been filed in December 2024 by four activists representing an animal welfare organisation, who argued that the shooting violated animal protection laws.
They also challenged the validity of certain local regulations related to animal licensing.
Case Sparked Nationwide Debate on Animal Welfare
The controversy gained national attention after a video showing the dog’s body circulated widely on social media.
The footage triggered emotional responses and intensified discussions about how stray animals are treated.
Local authorities had previously defended their actions, stating that the operation was carried out in accordance with established procedures.
While the court’s ruling has now brought the legal case to a close, the incident continues to fuel broader conversations about animal welfare and the balance between enforcement and compassion.
The case of ‘Kopi’ remains a reference point in ongoing debates over animal rights and public policy in Malaysia.
-wilayah.com.my
